Agents · Benchmark profile

DECK-Bench (Internal)

Moonshot AI's internal benchmark for presentation and deck-production workflows.

Reference2026Active1 models

Data verified 1 Aug 2026 · Methodology 2.3.0

Benchmark score on DECK-Bench (Internal)

Leaderboard · 1 models

Kimi K3 leads at 73.5%.

Display onlyAgents2026

#1Open

Kimi K3

Moonshot AI

kimi-k3

73.5%

Overall #7 · Context 1M tokens

ViewModelsColours

Moonshot AI

Lumina

DECK-Bench (Internal) leaderboard

Accessible data for DECK-Bench (Internal) leaderboard
Model	Rank	Model ID	Provider	Score	Unit
Kimi K3	#1	kimi-k3	Moonshot AI	73.5	percent

Benchmark score table (1 models)

One best compatible score per canonical product · higher is better

DECK-Bench (Internal) leaderboard ranked by score
Rank	Model	Provider	License	Evidence use	Score
#1	Kimi K3 kimi-k3	Moonshot AI	open	Source carrier	73.5%

Configuration-preserving evidencePublished source rows (3)Exact source labels, configurations, versions and dated observations. Same-snapshot canonical/configuration projections are shown once.

Every distinct dated source-published row for DECK-Bench (Internal), including exact model configuration labels
Exact published model / configuration	Canonical product	Score	Version / system	Evidence	Source / observed
Exact BenchLM registry variant Kimi K3; bulk export does not retain a complete upstream harness configuration. source label without registered configuration ID	Kimi K3	73.5%	2026Source-native system	Source carrier · no additional scoring weight source-checked	BenchLM public datasets — 2026-08-01 ↗Observed 2026-08-01 · checked 2026-08-01
Exact BenchLM registry variant Kimi K3; bulk export does not retain a complete upstream harness configuration. source label without registered configuration ID	Kimi K3	73.5%	2026Source-native system	Source carrier · no additional scoring weight source-checked	BenchLM public datasets — 2026-07-27 ↗Observed 2026-07-27 · checked 2026-07-27
Exact BenchLM registry variant Kimi K3; bulk export does not retain a complete upstream harness configuration. source label without registered configuration ID	Kimi K3	73.5%	2026Source-native system	Source carrier · no additional scoring weight source-checked	BenchLM public datasets — 21 July 2026 ↗Observed 2026-07-21 · checked 2026-07-21

About DECK-Bench (Internal)

Definition and scoring

Organisation: Moonshot AI
Category: Agents
Version: 2026
Direction: higher is better
Ranking use: Reference
Contamination risk: Unknown

Moonshot AI's internal benchmark for presentation and deck-production workflows. Every genuine source row stays tied to its exact model label, configuration, benchmark version and evaluation system. The summary chart shows one best compatible score per canonical product; Score 2.0 admits only explicitly mapped, frozen protocols and keeps incompatible configurations separate.

Open benchmark source ↗

FAQ

Quick answers

What does DECK-Bench (Internal) measure?

Moonshot AI's internal benchmark for presentation and deck-production workflows.

Which model scores highest on DECK-Bench (Internal)?

Kimi K3 by Moonshot AI currently leads with 73.5%.

How many models are evaluated on DECK-Bench (Internal)?

1 canonical model product have a qualifying score, backed by 3 distinct dated source rows.

Does this affect overall Lumina rank?

No. This benchmark is display-only and does not enter the overall Lumina composite.

Agents · Benchmark profile

DECK-Bench (Internal)

Moonshot AI's internal benchmark for presentation and deck-production workflows.

Reference2026Active1 models

Data verified 1 Aug 2026 · Methodology 2.3.0

Benchmark score on DECK-Bench (Internal)

Leaderboard · 1 models

Kimi K3 leads at 73.5%.

Display onlyAgents2026

#1Open

Kimi K3

Moonshot AI

kimi-k3

73.5%

Overall #7 · Context 1M tokens

ViewModelsColours

Moonshot AI

Lumina

DECK-Bench (Internal) leaderboard

Accessible data for DECK-Bench (Internal) leaderboard
Model	Rank	Model ID	Provider	Score	Unit
Kimi K3	#1	kimi-k3	Moonshot AI	73.5	percent

Benchmark score table (1 models)

One best compatible score per canonical product · higher is better

DECK-Bench (Internal) leaderboard ranked by score
Rank	Model	Provider	License	Evidence use	Score
#1	Kimi K3 kimi-k3	Moonshot AI	open	Source carrier	73.5%

Configuration-preserving evidencePublished source rows (3)Exact source labels, configurations, versions and dated observations. Same-snapshot canonical/configuration projections are shown once.

Every distinct dated source-published row for DECK-Bench (Internal), including exact model configuration labels
Exact published model / configuration	Canonical product	Score	Version / system	Evidence	Source / observed
Exact BenchLM registry variant Kimi K3; bulk export does not retain a complete upstream harness configuration. source label without registered configuration ID	Kimi K3	73.5%	2026Source-native system	Source carrier · no additional scoring weight source-checked	BenchLM public datasets — 2026-08-01 ↗Observed 2026-08-01 · checked 2026-08-01
Exact BenchLM registry variant Kimi K3; bulk export does not retain a complete upstream harness configuration. source label without registered configuration ID	Kimi K3	73.5%	2026Source-native system	Source carrier · no additional scoring weight source-checked	BenchLM public datasets — 2026-07-27 ↗Observed 2026-07-27 · checked 2026-07-27
Exact BenchLM registry variant Kimi K3; bulk export does not retain a complete upstream harness configuration. source label without registered configuration ID	Kimi K3	73.5%	2026Source-native system	Source carrier · no additional scoring weight source-checked	BenchLM public datasets — 21 July 2026 ↗Observed 2026-07-21 · checked 2026-07-21

About DECK-Bench (Internal)

Definition and scoring

Organisation: Moonshot AI
Category: Agents
Version: 2026
Direction: higher is better
Ranking use: Reference
Contamination risk: Unknown

Open benchmark source ↗

FAQ

Quick answers

What does DECK-Bench (Internal) measure?

Moonshot AI's internal benchmark for presentation and deck-production workflows.

Which model scores highest on DECK-Bench (Internal)?

Kimi K3 by Moonshot AI currently leads with 73.5%.

How many models are evaluated on DECK-Bench (Internal)?

1 canonical model product have a qualifying score, backed by 3 distinct dated source rows.

Does this affect overall Lumina rank?

No. This benchmark is display-only and does not enter the overall Lumina composite.

Navigation

DECK-Bench (Internal)

Leaderboard · 1 models

Kimi K3

DECK-Bench (Internal) leaderboard

Crop DECK-Bench (Internal) leaderboard

Benchmark score table (1 models)

Crop DECK-Bench (Internal) benchmark table

Crop DECK-Bench (Internal) published source rows

Definition and scoring

Quick answers

What does DECK-Bench (Internal) measure?

Which model scores highest on DECK-Bench (Internal)?

How many models are evaluated on DECK-Bench (Internal)?

Does this affect overall Lumina rank?

DECK-Bench (Internal)

Leaderboard · 1 models

Kimi K3

DECK-Bench (Internal) leaderboard

Crop DECK-Bench (Internal) leaderboard

Benchmark score table (1 models)

Crop DECK-Bench (Internal) benchmark table

Crop DECK-Bench (Internal) published source rows

Definition and scoring

Quick answers

What does DECK-Bench (Internal) measure?

Which model scores highest on DECK-Bench (Internal)?

How many models are evaluated on DECK-Bench (Internal)?

Does this affect overall Lumina rank?

Leaderboard · 1 models

Kimi K3

Benchmark score table (1 models)

Definition and scoring

Quick answers

What does DECK-Bench (Internal) measure?

Which model scores highest on DECK-Bench (Internal)?

How many models are evaluated on DECK-Bench (Internal)?

Does this affect overall Lumina rank?

More Agents benchmarks

Leaderboard · 1 models

Kimi K3

Benchmark score table (1 models)

Definition and scoring

Quick answers

What does DECK-Bench (Internal) measure?

Which model scores highest on DECK-Bench (Internal)?

How many models are evaluated on DECK-Bench (Internal)?

Does this affect overall Lumina rank?

More Agents benchmarks