Lumina
olmOCR-Bench leaderboard
1 ranked models · higher is better · labels show rank and score
View accessible chart data
| Model | Rank | Provider | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interfaze Beta | #1 | Interfaze | 85.7% |
Loading benchmark header
Loading benchmark registry
Multimodal · Benchmark profile
An end-to-end document understanding benchmark over long, layout-rich PDFs with tables, equations, headers, footnotes, and multi-column flows.
Data verified 27 Jul 2026 · Methodology 1.8.0
1 ranked models · higher is better · labels show rank and score
| Model | Rank | Provider | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interfaze Beta | #1 | Interfaze | 85.7% |
One best score per model · higher is better
| Rank | Model | Provider | License | Evidence use | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Interfaze Beta interfaze-beta | Interfaze | closed | Estimated reference | 85.7% |
About olmOCR-Bench
An end-to-end document understanding benchmark over long, layout-rich PDFs with tables, equations, headers, footnotes, and multi-column flows. Results stay tied to the exact model variant and evaluation system. Multiple systems for the same model use the best published score on this page; overall Lumina scoring uses the median of ranking-eligible rows.
Open benchmark source ↗FAQ
An end-to-end document understanding benchmark over long, layout-rich PDFs with tables, equations, headers, footnotes, and multi-column flows.
Interfaze Beta by Interfaze currently leads with 85.7%.
1 model in the LuminaBench cohort have a qualifying score on this benchmark.
Related