LuminaBench
Coding benchmark / Cursor

CursorBench

Lumina VerifiedLumina checked the published sources, versions, model labels, score extraction and conversion. External evaluations were run by their publishers; Lumina has not independently rerun or reproduced them.

Agentic coding on tasks drawn from real engineering work. Published results, checked by Lumina.

Version 4.0Verified 30 October 202681 published resultsOfficial source
81 of 81 publisher records

CursorBench · Lumina Score

Publisher results on a fixed Lumina scale. Experimental calibration.

LuminaBench
Show
20 of 81 configurations
03006009001,200Claude Opus 5.5 Max · CursorBench publisher-run agent evaluation · 11611,161Claude Opus 5.5MaxClaude Opus 5.5 xHigh · CursorBench publisher-run agent evaluation · 11461,146Claude Opus 5.5xHighClaude Opus 5.5 High · CursorBench publisher-run agent evaluation · 11461,146Claude Opus 5.5HighClaude Sonnet 5.5 Max · CursorBench publisher-run agent evaluation · 11411,141Claude Sonnet 5.5MaxClaude Sonnet 5.5 xHigh · CursorBench publisher-run agent evaluation · 11211,121Claude Sonnet 5.5xHighGemini 4 Argon High · CursorBench publisher-run agent evaluation · 11191,119Gemini 4 ArgonHighGemini 4 Argon Medium · CursorBench publisher-run agent evaluation · 11181,118Gemini 4 ArgonMediumClaude Opus 5.5 Medium · CursorBench publisher-run agent evaluation · 11161,116Claude Opus 5.5MediumClaude Fable 5.1 Max · CursorBench publisher-run agent evaluation · 11101,110Claude Fable 5.1MaxClaude Fable 5.1 xHigh · CursorBench publisher-run agent evaluation · 11081,108Claude Fable 5.1xHighGemini 4 Argon Low · CursorBench publisher-run agent evaluation · 11001,100Gemini 4 ArgonLowMuse Wonder Max · CursorBench publisher-run agent evaluation · 10981,098Muse WonderMaxClaude Fable 5.1 High · CursorBench publisher-run agent evaluation · 10881,088Claude Fable 5.1HighClaude Haiku 5.5 Max · CursorBench publisher-run agent evaluation · 10811,081Claude Haiku 5.5MaxMuse Wonder xHigh · CursorBench publisher-run agent evaluation · 10791,079Muse WonderxHighClaude Sonnet 5.5 High · CursorBench publisher-run agent evaluation · 10761,076Claude Sonnet 5.5HighDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Max · CursorBench publisher-run agent evaluation · 10751,075DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017MaxClaude Fable 5.1 Medium · CursorBench publisher-run agent evaluation · 10671,067Claude Fable 5.1MediumClaude Opus 5 Max · CursorBench publisher-run agent evaluation · 10651,065Claude Opus 5MaxDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Medium · CursorBench publisher-run agent evaluation · 10631,063DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Medium

Lumina Score vs Cost per Task

Published API-equivalent USD per task.

LuminaBench
8 of 19 families
$0.1$0.3$1$3$108009001,0001,1001,200Average API-equivalent cost/task · USD (log scale)Lumina ScoreClaude Opus 5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5Gemini 4 ArgonClaude Fable 5.1Muse WonderClaude Haiku 5.5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Claude Opus 5

Lumina Score vs Output Tokens

Published output tokens per task; input and cached tokens are not included.

LuminaBench
8 of 19 families
10K30K100K300K8009001,0001,1001,200Average output tokens/task (log scale)Lumina ScoreClaude Opus 5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5Gemini 4 ArgonClaude Fable 5.1Muse WonderClaude Haiku 5.5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Claude Opus 5

Lumina Score vs Agent Steps

Published agent steps per task. Steps are not tool calls or generation time.

LuminaBench
8 of 19 families
501001502008009001,0001,1001,200Average agent steps/taskLumina ScoreClaude Opus 5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5Gemini 4 ArgonClaude Fable 5.1Muse WonderClaude Haiku 5.5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Claude Opus 5

Publisher-reported averages. Numeric confidence intervals were not published. Missing metrics are omitted from their graph; quality scores remain available.

All results

CursorBench 4.0. Original publisher values and provisional Lumina conversion.
Rank
1Claude Opus 5.5Max · CursorBench agent1,16157.8%$13.43218,363185
2Claude Opus 5.5xHigh · CursorBench agent1,14656%$6.98101,083109
2Claude Opus 5.5High · CursorBench agent1,14656%$3.9753,07868
4Claude Sonnet 5.5Max · CursorBench agent1,14155.5%$7.05271,920170
5Claude Sonnet 5.5xHigh · CursorBench agent1,12153.1%$2.81100,15878
6Gemini 4 ArgonHigh · CursorBench agent1,11952.9%$4.57109,500118
7Gemini 4 ArgonMedium · CursorBench agent1,11852.8%$4.39103,600115
8Claude Opus 5.5Medium · CursorBench agent1,11652.5%$2.9137,95454
9Claude Fable 5.1Max · CursorBench agent1,11051.8%$17.28117,236128
10Claude Fable 5.1xHigh · CursorBench agent1,10851.6%$13.0187,294101
11Gemini 4 ArgonLow · CursorBench agent1,10050.6%$4.0994,200110
12Muse WonderMax · CursorBench agent1,09850.4%$5.2549,692114
13Claude Fable 5.1High · CursorBench agent1,08849.2%$9.0858,43877
14Claude Haiku 5.5Max · CursorBench agent1,08148.4%$1.12325,934163
15Muse WonderxHigh · CursorBench agent1,07948.2%$4.2439,56496
16Claude Sonnet 5.5High · CursorBench agent1,07647.8%$1.237,39141
17DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Max · CursorBench agent1,07547.7%$0.98537,047187
18Claude Fable 5.1Medium · CursorBench agent1,06746.8%$7.0545,41163
19Claude Opus 5Max · CursorBench agent1,06546.6%$11.9585,384106
20DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Medium · CursorBench agent1,06346.3%$0.8398,255189
20Grok 4.7xHigh · CursorBench agent1,06346.3%$6.0170,14188
22Muse WonderHigh · CursorBench agent1,06146.1%$3.5133,61284
22Claude Opus 5xHigh · CursorBench agent1,06146.1%$11.4380,094103
24DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017High · CursorBench agent1,05745.6%$0.77385,196186
25Claude Fable 5.1Low · CursorBench agent1,05345.1%$5.4434,79551
25Muse WonderMedium · CursorBench agent1,05345.2%$2.8227,12475
27DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Low · CursorBench agent1,05144.9%$0.6290,651161
28Claude Opus 5High · CursorBench agent1,04944.7%$961,40586
29Claude Haiku 5.5xHigh · CursorBench agent1,04644.3%$0.56143,81393
30Grok 4.7High · CursorBench agent1,04243.9%$4.6956,38271
31Claude Opus 5.5Low · CursorBench agent1,04143.7%$1.1715,81128
32Claude Opus 5Medium · CursorBench agent1,03743.3%$6.9445,27272
33GLM 5.3Max · CursorBench agent1,03142.6%$5.0596,387166
34Claude Haiku 5.5High · CursorBench agent1,02942.3%$0.3277,05759
35GPT-5.6 SolMax · CursorBench agent1,02341.7%$8.2342,94499
35Grok 4.7Medium · CursorBench agent1,02341.6%$3.4936,68360
35Muse Spark 1.3Max · CursorBench agent1,02341.6%$2.6452,00598
35Muse WonderLow · CursorBench agent1,02341.7%$1.9118,88056
39Grok 4.6xHigh · CursorBench agent1,02141.4%$6.149,81456
40GPT-5.6 TerraMax · CursorBench agent1,02041.3%$5.1460,814107
41Claude Opus 5Low · CursorBench agent1,01540.7%$4.8731,99557
42Grok 4.6High · CursorBench agent1,01240.4%$5.241,38748
43Gemini 3.8 FlashHigh · CursorBench agent1,00639.6%$4.7162,565324
44Claude Sonnet 5.5Medium · CursorBench agent1,00239.2%$0.5216,03622
45GLM 5.3High · CursorBench agent99238%$3.2460,031114
46GPT-5.6 SolxHigh · CursorBench agent98937.7%$4.424,72955
47Muse Spark 1.3xHigh · CursorBench agent98837.5%$2.140,89183
48Gemini 3.8 FlashMedium · CursorBench agent98637.3%$4.06128,364290
49GLM 5.3 FlashMax · CursorBench agent98236.8%$0.3956,410118
49Claude Haiku 5.5Medium · CursorBench agent98236.9%$0.1742,65939
51Grok 4.6Medium · CursorBench agent97636.1%$3.4824,89340
52GPT-5.6 LunaMax · CursorBench agent97435.9%$1.0387,284208
53Claude Sonnet 5.5Low · CursorBench agent97335.8%$0.3711,66818
54GPT-5.6 SolHigh · CursorBench agent97235.7%$2.8516,17441
55Muse WonderMinimal · CursorBench agent95934.2%$0.849,76133
55Claude Sonnet 5Max · CursorBench agent95934.1%$7.17149,257140
57GPT-5.6 TerraxHigh · CursorBench agent95433.6%$1.8123,43643
58Grok 4.6Low · CursorBench agent95333.4%$2.2516,30732
58Muse Spark 1.3High · CursorBench agent95333.4%$1.6630,65469
60GLM 5.3Low · CursorBench agent95233.3%$2.0431,98381
61Grok 4.7Low · CursorBench agent95033.1%$1.5815,67740
62GPT-5.6 LunaxHigh · CursorBench agent94933%$0.4440,59898
63Muse Spark 1.3Medium · CursorBench agent94632.6%$1.4927,25564
64Claude Sonnet 5xHigh · CursorBench agent94132%$4.5583,373102
65GLM 5.3 FlashHigh · CursorBench agent93331.1%$0.2535,10484
65GPT-5.6 SolMedium · CursorBench agent93331.1%$1.7710,11132
67Claude Haiku 5.5Low · CursorBench agent93130.9%$0.0823,38225
68Claude Sonnet 5High · CursorBench agent93030.8%$3.4861,14685
69GPT-5.6 TerraHigh · CursorBench agent92930.7%$1.1113,16233
70GPT-5.6 LunaHigh · CursorBench agent91829.4%$0.2523,36864
71Muse Spark 1.3Low · CursorBench agent91729.3%$0.9317,48347
72Claude Sonnet 5Medium · CursorBench agent90628%$2.3139,11465
73Composer 2.5Not specified · CursorBench agent90427.7%$0.6817,34741
74GPT-5.6 TerraMedium · CursorBench agent90327.6%$0.647,30725
75GLM 5.3 FlashLow · CursorBench agent89726.9%$0.1517,83158
76GPT-5.6 TerraLow · CursorBench agent88225.2%$0.525,91423
77GPT-5.6 SolLow · CursorBench agent87724.6%$0.874,88521
78Muse Spark 1.3Minimal · CursorBench agent87524.3%$0.5610,62034
79Claude Sonnet 5Low · CursorBench agent87324.1%$1.3923,77246
80GPT-5.6 LunaMedium · CursorBench agent85722.2%$0.087,64232
81GPT-5.6 LunaLow · CursorBench agent80416%$0.033,28818
1 · Claude Opus 5.5Max1161
CursorBench score
57.8%
API USD/task
$13.43
Output tokens/task
218,363
Agent steps/task
185
Evidence
Model profile ↗
2 · Claude Opus 5.5xHigh1146
CursorBench score
56%
API USD/task
$6.98
Output tokens/task
101,083
Agent steps/task
109
Evidence
Model profile ↗
2 · Claude Opus 5.5High1146
CursorBench score
56%
API USD/task
$3.97
Output tokens/task
53,078
Agent steps/task
68
Evidence
Model profile ↗
4 · Claude Sonnet 5.5Max1141
CursorBench score
55.5%
API USD/task
$7.05
Output tokens/task
271,920
Agent steps/task
170
Evidence
Model profile ↗
5 · Claude Sonnet 5.5xHigh1121
CursorBench score
53.1%
API USD/task
$2.81
Output tokens/task
100,158
Agent steps/task
78
Evidence
Model profile ↗
6 · Gemini 4 ArgonHigh1119
CursorBench score
52.9%
API USD/task
$4.57
Output tokens/task
109,500
Agent steps/task
118
Evidence
Model profile ↗
7 · Gemini 4 ArgonMedium1118
CursorBench score
52.8%
API USD/task
$4.39
Output tokens/task
103,600
Agent steps/task
115
Evidence
Model profile ↗
8 · Claude Opus 5.5Medium1116
CursorBench score
52.5%
API USD/task
$2.91
Output tokens/task
37,954
Agent steps/task
54
Evidence
Model profile ↗
9 · Claude Fable 5.1Max1110
CursorBench score
51.8%
API USD/task
$17.28
Output tokens/task
117,236
Agent steps/task
128
Evidence
Model profile ↗
10 · Claude Fable 5.1xHigh1108
CursorBench score
51.6%
API USD/task
$13.01
Output tokens/task
87,294
Agent steps/task
101
Evidence
Model profile ↗
11 · Gemini 4 ArgonLow1100
CursorBench score
50.6%
API USD/task
$4.09
Output tokens/task
94,200
Agent steps/task
110
Evidence
Model profile ↗
12 · Muse WonderMax1098
CursorBench score
50.4%
API USD/task
$5.25
Output tokens/task
49,692
Agent steps/task
114
Evidence
Model profile ↗
13 · Claude Fable 5.1High1088
CursorBench score
49.2%
API USD/task
$9.08
Output tokens/task
58,438
Agent steps/task
77
Evidence
Model profile ↗
14 · Claude Haiku 5.5Max1081
CursorBench score
48.4%
API USD/task
$1.12
Output tokens/task
325,934
Agent steps/task
163
Evidence
Model profile ↗
15 · Muse WonderxHigh1079
CursorBench score
48.2%
API USD/task
$4.24
Output tokens/task
39,564
Agent steps/task
96
Evidence
Model profile ↗
16 · Claude Sonnet 5.5High1076
CursorBench score
47.8%
API USD/task
$1.2
Output tokens/task
37,391
Agent steps/task
41
Evidence
Model profile ↗
17 · DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Max1075
CursorBench score
47.7%
API USD/task
$0.98
Output tokens/task
537,047
Agent steps/task
187
Evidence
Model profile ↗
18 · Claude Fable 5.1Medium1067
CursorBench score
46.8%
API USD/task
$7.05
Output tokens/task
45,411
Agent steps/task
63
Evidence
Model profile ↗
19 · Claude Opus 5Max1065
CursorBench score
46.6%
API USD/task
$11.95
Output tokens/task
85,384
Agent steps/task
106
Evidence
Model profile ↗
20 · DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Medium1063
CursorBench score
46.3%
API USD/task
$0.8
Output tokens/task
398,255
Agent steps/task
189
Evidence
Model profile ↗
20 · Grok 4.7xHigh1063
CursorBench score
46.3%
API USD/task
$6.01
Output tokens/task
70,141
Agent steps/task
88
Evidence
Model profile ↗
22 · Muse WonderHigh1061
CursorBench score
46.1%
API USD/task
$3.51
Output tokens/task
33,612
Agent steps/task
84
Evidence
Model profile ↗
22 · Claude Opus 5xHigh1061
CursorBench score
46.1%
API USD/task
$11.43
Output tokens/task
80,094
Agent steps/task
103
Evidence
Model profile ↗
24 · DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017High1057
CursorBench score
45.6%
API USD/task
$0.77
Output tokens/task
385,196
Agent steps/task
186
Evidence
Model profile ↗
25 · Claude Fable 5.1Low1053
CursorBench score
45.1%
API USD/task
$5.44
Output tokens/task
34,795
Agent steps/task
51
Evidence
Model profile ↗
25 · Muse WonderMedium1053
CursorBench score
45.2%
API USD/task
$2.82
Output tokens/task
27,124
Agent steps/task
75
Evidence
Model profile ↗
27 · DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Low1051
CursorBench score
44.9%
API USD/task
$0.6
Output tokens/task
290,651
Agent steps/task
161
Evidence
Model profile ↗
28 · Claude Opus 5High1049
CursorBench score
44.7%
API USD/task
$9
Output tokens/task
61,405
Agent steps/task
86
Evidence
Model profile ↗
29 · Claude Haiku 5.5xHigh1046
CursorBench score
44.3%
API USD/task
$0.56
Output tokens/task
143,813
Agent steps/task
93
Evidence
Model profile ↗
30 · Grok 4.7High1042
CursorBench score
43.9%
API USD/task
$4.69
Output tokens/task
56,382
Agent steps/task
71
Evidence
Model profile ↗
31 · Claude Opus 5.5Low1041
CursorBench score
43.7%
API USD/task
$1.17
Output tokens/task
15,811
Agent steps/task
28
Evidence
Model profile ↗
32 · Claude Opus 5Medium1037
CursorBench score
43.3%
API USD/task
$6.94
Output tokens/task
45,272
Agent steps/task
72
Evidence
Model profile ↗
33 · GLM 5.3Max1031
CursorBench score
42.6%
API USD/task
$5.05
Output tokens/task
96,387
Agent steps/task
166
Evidence
Model profile ↗
34 · Claude Haiku 5.5High1029
CursorBench score
42.3%
API USD/task
$0.32
Output tokens/task
77,057
Agent steps/task
59
Evidence
Model profile ↗
35 · GPT-5.6 SolMax1023
CursorBench score
41.7%
API USD/task
$8.23
Output tokens/task
42,944
Agent steps/task
99
Evidence
Model profile ↗
35 · Grok 4.7Medium1023
CursorBench score
41.6%
API USD/task
$3.49
Output tokens/task
36,683
Agent steps/task
60
Evidence
Model profile ↗
35 · Muse Spark 1.3Max1023
CursorBench score
41.6%
API USD/task
$2.64
Output tokens/task
52,005
Agent steps/task
98
Evidence
Model profile ↗
35 · Muse WonderLow1023
CursorBench score
41.7%
API USD/task
$1.91
Output tokens/task
18,880
Agent steps/task
56
Evidence
Model profile ↗
39 · Grok 4.6xHigh1021
CursorBench score
41.4%
API USD/task
$6.1
Output tokens/task
49,814
Agent steps/task
56
Evidence
Model profile ↗
40 · GPT-5.6 TerraMax1020
CursorBench score
41.3%
API USD/task
$5.14
Output tokens/task
60,814
Agent steps/task
107
Evidence
Model profile ↗
41 · Claude Opus 5Low1015
CursorBench score
40.7%
API USD/task
$4.87
Output tokens/task
31,995
Agent steps/task
57
Evidence
Model profile ↗
42 · Grok 4.6High1012
CursorBench score
40.4%
API USD/task
$5.2
Output tokens/task
41,387
Agent steps/task
48
Evidence
Model profile ↗
43 · Gemini 3.8 FlashHigh1006
CursorBench score
39.6%
API USD/task
$4.7
Output tokens/task
162,565
Agent steps/task
324
Evidence
Model profile ↗
44 · Claude Sonnet 5.5Medium1002
CursorBench score
39.2%
API USD/task
$0.52
Output tokens/task
16,036
Agent steps/task
22
Evidence
Model profile ↗
45 · GLM 5.3High992
CursorBench score
38%
API USD/task
$3.24
Output tokens/task
60,031
Agent steps/task
114
Evidence
Model profile ↗
46 · GPT-5.6 SolxHigh989
CursorBench score
37.7%
API USD/task
$4.4
Output tokens/task
24,729
Agent steps/task
55
Evidence
Model profile ↗
47 · Muse Spark 1.3xHigh988
CursorBench score
37.5%
API USD/task
$2.1
Output tokens/task
40,891
Agent steps/task
83
Evidence
Model profile ↗
48 · Gemini 3.8 FlashMedium986
CursorBench score
37.3%
API USD/task
$4.06
Output tokens/task
128,364
Agent steps/task
290
Evidence
Model profile ↗
49 · GLM 5.3 FlashMax982
CursorBench score
36.8%
API USD/task
$0.39
Output tokens/task
56,410
Agent steps/task
118
Evidence
Model profile ↗
49 · Claude Haiku 5.5Medium982
CursorBench score
36.9%
API USD/task
$0.17
Output tokens/task
42,659
Agent steps/task
39
Evidence
Model profile ↗
51 · Grok 4.6Medium976
CursorBench score
36.1%
API USD/task
$3.48
Output tokens/task
24,893
Agent steps/task
40
Evidence
Model profile ↗
52 · GPT-5.6 LunaMax974
CursorBench score
35.9%
API USD/task
$1.03
Output tokens/task
87,284
Agent steps/task
208
Evidence
Model profile ↗
53 · Claude Sonnet 5.5Low973
CursorBench score
35.8%
API USD/task
$0.37
Output tokens/task
11,668
Agent steps/task
18
Evidence
Model profile ↗
54 · GPT-5.6 SolHigh972
CursorBench score
35.7%
API USD/task
$2.85
Output tokens/task
16,174
Agent steps/task
41
Evidence
Model profile ↗
55 · Muse WonderMinimal959
CursorBench score
34.2%
API USD/task
$0.84
Output tokens/task
9,761
Agent steps/task
33
Evidence
Model profile ↗
55 · Claude Sonnet 5Max959
CursorBench score
34.1%
API USD/task
$7.17
Output tokens/task
149,257
Agent steps/task
140
Evidence
Model profile ↗
57 · GPT-5.6 TerraxHigh954
CursorBench score
33.6%
API USD/task
$1.81
Output tokens/task
23,436
Agent steps/task
43
Evidence
Model profile ↗
58 · Grok 4.6Low953
CursorBench score
33.4%
API USD/task
$2.25
Output tokens/task
16,307
Agent steps/task
32
Evidence
Model profile ↗
58 · Muse Spark 1.3High953
CursorBench score
33.4%
API USD/task
$1.66
Output tokens/task
30,654
Agent steps/task
69
Evidence
Model profile ↗
60 · GLM 5.3Low952
CursorBench score
33.3%
API USD/task
$2.04
Output tokens/task
31,983
Agent steps/task
81
Evidence
Model profile ↗
61 · Grok 4.7Low950
CursorBench score
33.1%
API USD/task
$1.58
Output tokens/task
15,677
Agent steps/task
40
Evidence
Model profile ↗
62 · GPT-5.6 LunaxHigh949
CursorBench score
33%
API USD/task
$0.44
Output tokens/task
40,598
Agent steps/task
98
Evidence
Model profile ↗
63 · Muse Spark 1.3Medium946
CursorBench score
32.6%
API USD/task
$1.49
Output tokens/task
27,255
Agent steps/task
64
Evidence
Model profile ↗
64 · Claude Sonnet 5xHigh941
CursorBench score
32%
API USD/task
$4.55
Output tokens/task
83,373
Agent steps/task
102
Evidence
Model profile ↗
65 · GLM 5.3 FlashHigh933
CursorBench score
31.1%
API USD/task
$0.25
Output tokens/task
35,104
Agent steps/task
84
Evidence
Model profile ↗
65 · GPT-5.6 SolMedium933
CursorBench score
31.1%
API USD/task
$1.77
Output tokens/task
10,111
Agent steps/task
32
Evidence
Model profile ↗
67 · Claude Haiku 5.5Low931
CursorBench score
30.9%
API USD/task
$0.08
Output tokens/task
23,382
Agent steps/task
25
Evidence
Model profile ↗
68 · Claude Sonnet 5High930
CursorBench score
30.8%
API USD/task
$3.48
Output tokens/task
61,146
Agent steps/task
85
Evidence
Model profile ↗
69 · GPT-5.6 TerraHigh929
CursorBench score
30.7%
API USD/task
$1.11
Output tokens/task
13,162
Agent steps/task
33
Evidence
Model profile ↗
70 · GPT-5.6 LunaHigh918
CursorBench score
29.4%
API USD/task
$0.25
Output tokens/task
23,368
Agent steps/task
64
Evidence
Model profile ↗
71 · Muse Spark 1.3Low917
CursorBench score
29.3%
API USD/task
$0.93
Output tokens/task
17,483
Agent steps/task
47
Evidence
Model profile ↗
72 · Claude Sonnet 5Medium906
CursorBench score
28%
API USD/task
$2.31
Output tokens/task
39,114
Agent steps/task
65
Evidence
Model profile ↗
73 · Composer 2.5Not specified904
CursorBench score
27.7%
API USD/task
$0.68
Output tokens/task
17,347
Agent steps/task
41
Evidence
Model profile ↗
74 · GPT-5.6 TerraMedium903
CursorBench score
27.6%
API USD/task
$0.64
Output tokens/task
7,307
Agent steps/task
25
Evidence
Model profile ↗
75 · GLM 5.3 FlashLow897
CursorBench score
26.9%
API USD/task
$0.15
Output tokens/task
17,831
Agent steps/task
58
Evidence
Model profile ↗
76 · GPT-5.6 TerraLow882
CursorBench score
25.2%
API USD/task
$0.52
Output tokens/task
5,914
Agent steps/task
23
Evidence
Model profile ↗
77 · GPT-5.6 SolLow877
CursorBench score
24.6%
API USD/task
$0.87
Output tokens/task
4,885
Agent steps/task
21
Evidence
Model profile ↗
78 · Muse Spark 1.3Minimal875
CursorBench score
24.3%
API USD/task
$0.56
Output tokens/task
10,620
Agent steps/task
34
Evidence
Model profile ↗
79 · Claude Sonnet 5Low873
CursorBench score
24.1%
API USD/task
$1.39
Output tokens/task
23,772
Agent steps/task
46
Evidence
Model profile ↗
80 · GPT-5.6 LunaMedium857
CursorBench score
22.2%
API USD/task
$0.08
Output tokens/task
7,642
Agent steps/task
32
Evidence
Model profile ↗
81 · GPT-5.6 LunaLow804
CursorBench score
16%
API USD/task
$0.03
Output tokens/task
3,288
Agent steps/task
18
Evidence
Model profile ↗

Source & conversion

Cursor reports solution-correctness scores on coding tasks drawn from real engineering work. The exact version4.0 task count, agent build and dated API model snapshots are not published. Older methodology descriptions should not be treated as the complete version4.0 protocol.

API-equivalent task cost uses published input, cache-read, cache-write and output pricing. Tokens means output tokens per task. Agent steps are publisher-reported averages; a formal step definition and comparable timing data are unavailable.

How the Lumina conversion works

1,000 + 75 × ((original score − 38.952) / 8.773237486811809). The result is rounded once. Scores may tie.

The fixed reference contains75 initial published configurations, excluding six Anthropic Max settings. Population standard deviation uses N. New entries use the same frozen parameters. This is a display calibration, not equivalence to our original creation tests.

Calibration
cursorbench-4-z75-v1 · experimental
Reference mean
38.952
Population SD
8.773237486811809
Coverage
Independent benchmark; no contribution to the current Capabilities Index.
Identity, exclusions & attribution

GPT-5.6 Sol, Terra and Luna are distinct from Lumina’s GPT-6.x test models. Serving-provider labels are retained separately from model producers. A source label does not establish a dated API snapshot or a match to a Lumina harness configuration.

All published reasoning settings, including Claude Max, are included by default. Display labels use Low and xHigh; source labels remain in the retained records.

Published leaderboard · Publisher methodology · Model identity and pricing documentation

Publisher terms. Scores and resource figures are attributed to the original publisher.