LuminaBench
Coding benchmark / Forcebench

Forcebench — Full API

Lumina VerifiedLumina checked the published sources, versions, model labels, score extraction and conversion. External evaluations were run by their publishers; Lumina has not independently rerun or reproduced them.

Salesforce engineering across 272 tasks and 15 suites.

Version 0.2.0 · Full API · c@3Verified 2 November 202648 published resultsOfficial source

Forcebench — Full API · Lumina Score

LuminaBench
Show
20 of 29 models · best variant per model
03006009001,2001,089Claude Opus 5.5Low1,089Gemini 4 ArgonMedium1,085GPT-6 AstraMedium1,078GPT-6.1 SolHigh1,078Claude Sonnet 5.5High1,075Grok 4.7High1,064Grok 4.6High1,062Gemini 3.8 FlashMedium1,061GPT-5.6 SolMedium1,060Claude Fable 5.1High1,060Claude Opus 4.8Medium1,058Muse WonderLow1,036GPT-6 LunaMedium1,033DeepSeek V4.1 FlashHigh1,019Claude Sonnet 5High1,017Claude Haiku 5.5Medium996MiMo V2.6 ProThinking on991DeepSeek V4 ProHigh973GLM-5.3 FlashHigh967GLM-5.3Low

Lumina Score vs Cost per Task

Cumulative c@3 attempts at the dated API route price

LuminaBench
15 of 26 families
$0.001$0.003$0.01$0.03$0.1$0.38009001,0001,100Cost/task · USD (log scale)Lumina ScoreGPT-6 LunaClaude Opus 5.5Gemini 4 ArgonClaude Sonnet 5.5GPT-6.1 SolGPT-6 AstraGrok 4.7Grok 4.6Muse WonderGemini 3.8 FlashClaude Fable 5.1DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Sonnet 5

Lumina Score vs Output Tokens per Task

Service-counted output per task across c@3 attempts

LuminaBench
15 of 29 families
1K3K10K8009001,0001,100Mean output tokens/task (log scale)Lumina ScoreClaude Opus 5.5Gemini 4 ArgonClaude Sonnet 5.5GPT-6.1 SolGPT-6 AstraGrok 4.7Grok 4.6Gemini 3.8 FlashGPT-5.6 SolClaude Fable 5.1Claude Opus 4.8Muse WonderDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-6 LunaClaude Sonnet 5

Lumina Score vs Time per Task

Median cumulative task time across c@3 attempts; service and concurrency affect latency

LuminaBench
15 of 29 families
0.10.318009001,0001,100Median time/task · min (log scale)Lumina ScoreClaude Opus 5.5Gemini 4 ArgonClaude Sonnet 5.5GPT-6.1 SolGPT-6 AstraGrok 4.7Grok 4.6DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemini 3.8 FlashGPT-5.6 SolClaude Fable 5.1Claude Opus 4.8Muse WonderGPT-6 LunaClaude Sonnet 5

Full hosted/API evaluation, c@3: tasks solved within three feedback-assisted attempts, equal weight per suite. Pass@1 is separate. Local runs, lite sweeps and missing retries do not enter this ranking. Publisher 95% intervals resample tasks within suites; attempt ceilings are not actual attempt counts. Missing metrics are omitted from their graph; quality scores remain available.

Results table

Method & coverage

Full hosted/API evaluation, c@3: tasks solved within three feedback-assisted attempts, equal weight per suite. Pass@1 is separate. Local runs, lite sweeps and missing retries do not enter this ranking. Publisher 95% intervals resample tasks within suites; attempt ceilings are not actual attempt counts.

Publisher c@3 cumulative-attempt resources per task: dated route-list-price USD, service-reported mean output tokens, median wall time across tasks. Missing prices stay null. No cost-per-solved substitution or pass@1 resources.

How the Lumina conversion works

1,000 + 75 × ((original score − 71.8729885057471) / 20.18635763824424). The result is rounded once. Scores may tie.

Frozen initial eligible publisher cohort; one arithmetic mean per exact release/system, equally weighted across releases. Subsequent refreshes never refit. Strictly increasing conversion preserves source ordering at full precision; rounded display scores may tie.

Calibration
forcebench-api-z75-v1 · experimental
Reference mean
71.8729885057471
Population SD
20.18635763824424
Coverage
Standalone benchmark.
Identity, exclusions & attribution

Exact source release, effort, route and harness retained. Unknown evaluation dates stay unknown; no cross-source score estimates or combined indexes.

Code licensing is not assumed to clear separately published result redistribution.

All published reasoning settings, including Claude Max, are included by default. Display labels use Low and xHigh; source labels remain in the retained records.

Official results

Publisher terms. Scores and resource figures are attributed to the original publisher.