LuminaBench
Cyber benchmark / Vals AI

CyberBench v1.1

Lumina VerifiedLumina checked the published sources, versions, model labels, score extraction and conversion. External evaluations were run by their publishers; Lumina has not independently rerun or reproduced them.

Accuracy

Version 1.1-updated-2026-11-05Verified 6 November 202648 published resultsOfficial source

CyberBench v1.1

LuminaBench
Show
20 of 48 models · best variant per model
03006009001,2001,090WonderMax1,076GPT-6 SolMax1,075Gemini 4 ArgonHigh1,066GPT-5.6 SolMax1,066GPT-6 LunaMax1,061Claude Haiku 5.5Max1,061MiMo V2.6 Flash1,060Kimi K3Max1,056Claude Opus 5.5 (CVP)Max1,051DeepSeek V4.1 FlashHigh1,051Wonder FullMax1,051GPT-5.6 LunaMax1,047Daybreak BlueMax1,046DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Max1,046MiMo V2.6 Pro1,045Muse Spark 1.3 MaxMax1,045Models0.991,041DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731High1,041GPT-5.6 TerraMax1,041GLM 5.3Max

Lumina Score vs Cost per Task

Published per-test USD and Duration/Test retain their native definitions. Tokens use published averages or original aggregate counts divided by token_tasks_measured; total = input + output, with cache and reasoning subsets retained separately rather than counted twice. No task values are inferred from token prices or compute budgets.

LuminaBench
15 of 48 families
Lower resource use and higher score (green); higher resource use and lower score (red). Guides split at the visible selection’s medians.$0.1$0.3$1$38009001,0001,100Cost per task · USD (log scale)Lumina ScoreMiMo V2.6 FlashWonderGPT-6 SolGemini 4 ArgonGPT-6 LunaGPT-5.6 Sol

Lumina Score vs Tokens

Published per-test USD and Duration/Test retain their native definitions. Tokens use published averages or original aggregate counts divided by token_tasks_measured; total = input + output, with cache and reasoning subsets retained separately rather than counted twice. No task values are inferred from token prices or compute budgets.

LuminaBench
15 of 44 families
5M10M15M20M8009001,0001,100Total tokens per taskLumina ScoreGPT-6 SolWonderGemini 4 ArgonGPT-5.6 SolGPT-6 LunaClaude Haiku 5.5

Lumina Score vs Time per Task

Published per-test USD and Duration/Test retain their native definitions. Tokens use published averages or original aggregate counts divided by token_tasks_measured; total = input + output, with cache and reasoning subsets retained separately rather than counted twice. No task values are inferred from token prices or compute budgets.

LuminaBench
15 of 48 families
Lower resource use and higher score (green); higher resource use and lower score (red). Guides split at the visible selection’s medians.1020308009001,0001,100Time per task · minLumina ScoreGPT-5.6 SolWonderGPT-6 SolGemini 4 ArgonGPT-6 LunaClaude Haiku 5.5

Published per-test USD and Duration/Test retain their native definitions. Tokens use published averages or original aggregate counts divided by token_tasks_measured; total = input + output, with cache and reasoning subsets retained separately rather than counted twice. No task values are inferred from token prices or compute budgets. Missing metrics are omitted from their graph; quality scores remain available.

Results table

Method & coverage

Terminal/code vulnerability detection and patching against OSS-Fuzz ARVO container images; these are software containers, not visual inputs.

Published per-test USD and Duration/Test retain their native definitions. Tokens use published averages or original aggregate counts divided by token_tasks_measured; total = input + output, with cache and reasoning subsets retained separately rather than counted twice. No task values are inferred from token prices or compute budgets.

How the Lumina conversion works

1,000 + 75 × ((original score − 65.02858333333334) / 12.768394012549983). The result is rounded once. Scores may tie.

Frozen initial observed text-only cohort; one mean per exact publisher release/API, balancing repeated settings/routes within that release. Original score and protocol remain separate. No inferred variants or future refitting.

Calibration
vals-cyberbench-z75-v1 · experimental
Reference mean
65.02858333333334
Population SD
12.768394012549983
Coverage
Standalone benchmark.
Identity, exclusions & attribution

Terminal/code vulnerability detection and patching against OSS-Fuzz ARVO container images; these are software containers, not visual inputs.

Publisher standard errors retained; no confidence level or interval inferred. Aggregate reporting scope is recorded in the current source-specific publication review.

Standalone text benchmark; no new combined index. Source identity/effort/protocol qualifications remain in Data and CSV.

All published reasoning settings, including Claude Max, are included by default. Display labels use Low and xHigh; source labels remain in the retained records.

Official source · Publication terms / evidence

Publisher terms. Scores and resource figures are attributed to the original publisher.