LuminaBench
Finance benchmark / Vals AI

EMB v1.1

Lumina VerifiedLumina checked the published sources, versions, model labels, score extraction and conversion. External evaluations were run by their publishers; Lumina has not independently rerun or reproduced them.

Accuracy

Version 1.1-updated-2026-11-05Verified 6 November 202639 published resultsOfficial source

EMB v1.1

LuminaBench
Show
20 of 39 models · best variant per model
03006009001,2001,086Claude Fable 5.1Max1,084Gemini 4 CarbonHigh1,078Claude Sonnet 5.5Max1,078Claude Opus 5.5Max1,070Wonder FullMax1,068Gemini 4 ArgonHigh1,054GPT-6.1 TerraMax1,050Gemini 3.8 FlashHigh1,048GPT-6 AstraMax1,046WonderMax1,041alibaba/qwen3.8-max-internal1,037Grok 4.7xHigh1,035Kimi K3Max1,033GPT-6.1 SolMax1,023Kimi K3.1 ProMax1,022GPT-6 LunaMax1,019Step 5 Preview1,018Models0.991,015DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Max1,014GLM 5.3Max

Lumina Score vs Cost per Task

Published per-test USD and Duration/Test retain their native definitions. Tokens use published averages or original aggregate counts divided by token_tasks_measured; total = input + output, with cache and reasoning subsets retained separately rather than counted twice. No task values are inferred from token prices or compute budgets.

LuminaBench
15 of 38 families
Lower resource use and higher score (green); higher resource use and lower score (red). Guides split at the visible selection’s medians.$1$3$107008009001,0001,100Cost per task · USD (log scale)Lumina ScoreGPT-6.1 TerraClaude Fable 5.1Gemini 4 CarbonClaude Opus 5.5Wonder Full

Lumina Score vs Tokens

Published per-test USD and Duration/Test retain their native definitions. Tokens use published averages or original aggregate counts divided by token_tasks_measured; total = input + output, with cache and reasoning subsets retained separately rather than counted twice. No task values are inferred from token prices or compute budgets.

LuminaBench
15 of 39 families
3M10M30M7008009001,0001,100Total tokens per task (log scale)Lumina ScoreClaude Fable 5.1Gemini 4 CarbonClaude Opus 5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5Wonder FullGemini 4 Argon

Lumina Score vs Time per Task

Published per-test USD and Duration/Test retain their native definitions. Tokens use published averages or original aggregate counts divided by token_tasks_measured; total = input + output, with cache and reasoning subsets retained separately rather than counted twice. No task values are inferred from token prices or compute budgets.

LuminaBench
15 of 39 families
Lower resource use and higher score (green); higher resource use and lower score (red). Guides split at the visible selection’s medians.10203040507008009001,0001,100Time per task · minLumina ScoreClaude Fable 5.1Gemini 4 CarbonClaude Opus 5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5Kimi K3GPT-6.1 Terra

Published per-test USD and Duration/Test retain their native definitions. Tokens use published averages or original aggregate counts divided by token_tasks_measured; total = input + output, with cache and reasoning subsets retained separately rather than counted twice. No task values are inferred from token prices or compute budgets. Missing metrics are omitted from their graph; quality scores remain available.

Results table

Method & coverage

EMB v1.1 category-balanced mean across seven finance categories; Scratch and Template workflows use bash, workbook execution/recalculation and text retrieval tools. Distinct from v1.0. Preserve overall as publisher defines, not a new Lumina mix.

Published per-test USD and Duration/Test retain their native definitions. Tokens use published averages or original aggregate counts divided by token_tasks_measured; total = input + output, with cache and reasoning subsets retained separately rather than counted twice. No task values are inferred from token prices or compute budgets.

How the Lumina conversion works

1,000 + 75 × ((original score − 67.58005128205127) / 7.950461953837742). The result is rounded once. Scores may tie.

Frozen initial observed text-only cohort; one mean per exact publisher release/API, balancing repeated settings/routes within that release. Original score and protocol remain separate. No inferred variants or future refitting.

Calibration
vals-excel-modeling-z75-v1 · experimental
Reference mean
67.58005128205127
Population SD
7.950461953837742
Coverage
Standalone benchmark.
Identity, exclusions & attribution

EMB v1.1 category-balanced mean across seven finance categories; Scratch and Template workflows use bash, workbook execution/recalculation and text retrieval tools. Distinct from v1.0. Preserve overall as publisher defines, not a new Lumina mix.

Publisher standard errors retained; no confidence level or interval inferred. Aggregate reporting scope is recorded in the current source-specific publication review.

Standalone text benchmark; no new combined index. Source identity/effort/protocol qualifications remain in Data and CSV.

All published reasoning settings, including Claude Max, are included by default. Display labels use Low and xHigh; source labels remain in the retained records.

Official source · Publication terms / evidence

Publisher terms. Scores and resource figures are attributed to the original publisher.