LuminaBench
Coding benchmark / Vals AI

IOI

Lumina VerifiedLumina checked the published sources, versions, model labels, score extraction and conversion. External evaluations were run by their publishers; Lumina has not independently rerun or reproduced them.

Accuracy

Version 2-updated-2026-10-29Verified 6 November 202646 published resultsOfficial source

IOI

LuminaBench
Show
20 of 46 models · best variant per model
03006009001,2001,134Gemini 4 ArgonHigh1,134GPT-6 AstraMax1,125GPT-6.1 SolMax1,119Claude Opus 5.5Max1,107GPT-5.6 SolMax1,106Claude Fable 5.1Max1,096GPT-5.6 TerraMax1,086Claude Opus 5Max1,082Claude Sonnet 5.5Max1,080GPT-6 SolMax1,078Kimi K3.1 ProMax1,072Wonder FullMax1,038Qwen 3.8 Max1,036GLM 5.3Max1,034Gemini 3.7 FlashHigh1,032WonderMax1,016GPT-5.6 LunaMax1,008Hy4 Preview1,003Grok 4.7xHigh1,001Gemini 3.8 FlashHigh

Lumina Score vs Cost per Task

Published per-test USD and Duration/Test retain their native definitions. Tokens use published averages or original aggregate counts divided by token_tasks_measured; total = input + output, with cache and reasoning subsets retained separately rather than counted twice. No task values are inferred from token prices or compute budgets.

LuminaBench
15 of 45 families
Lower resource use and higher score (green); higher resource use and lower score (red). Guides split at the visible selection’s medians.$3$108009001,0001,1001,200Cost per task · USD (log scale)Lumina ScoreGPT-6.1 SolGemini 4 ArgonGPT-6 AstraClaude Opus 5.5GPT-5.6 SolClaude Fable 5.1

Lumina Score vs Tokens

Published per-test USD and Duration/Test retain their native definitions. Tokens use published averages or original aggregate counts divided by token_tasks_measured; total = input + output, with cache and reasoning subsets retained separately rather than counted twice. No task values are inferred from token prices or compute budgets.

LuminaBench
15 of 46 families
1M3M10M30M8009001,0001,1001,200Total tokens per task (log scale)Lumina ScoreGPT-6 AstraGPT-6.1 SolGemini 4 ArgonClaude Opus 5.5GPT-5.6 SolClaude Fable 5.1

Lumina Score vs Time per Task

Published per-test USD and Duration/Test retain their native definitions. Tokens use published averages or original aggregate counts divided by token_tasks_measured; total = input + output, with cache and reasoning subsets retained separately rather than counted twice. No task values are inferred from token prices or compute budgets.

LuminaBench
15 of 46 families
Lower resource use and higher score (green); higher resource use and lower score (red). Guides split at the visible selection’s medians.301008009001,0001,1001,200Time per task · min (log scale)Lumina ScoreClaude Opus 5.5Gemini 4 ArgonGPT-6 AstraGPT-6.1 SolGPT-5.6 SolClaude Fable 5.1

Published per-test USD and Duration/Test retain their native definitions. Tokens use published averages or original aggregate counts divided by token_tasks_measured; total = input + output, with cache and reasoning subsets retained separately rather than counted twice. No task values are inferred from token prices or compute budgets. Missing metrics are omitted from their graph; quality scores remain available.

Results table

Method & coverage

IOI v2 competitive-programming problems solved through code execution and tests; text statements.

Published per-test USD and Duration/Test retain their native definitions. Tokens use published averages or original aggregate counts divided by token_tasks_measured; total = input + output, with cache and reasoning subsets retained separately rather than counted twice. No task values are inferred from token prices or compute budgets.

How the Lumina conversion works

1,000 + 75 × ((original score − 56.770500000000006) / 24.11395383315211). The result is rounded once. Scores may tie.

Frozen initial observed text-only cohort; one mean per exact publisher release/API, balancing repeated settings/routes within that release. Original score and protocol remain separate. No inferred variants or future refitting.

Calibration
vals-ioi-z75-v1 · experimental
Reference mean
56.770500000000006
Population SD
24.11395383315211
Coverage
Standalone benchmark.
Identity, exclusions & attribution

IOI v2 competitive-programming problems solved through code execution and tests; text statements.

Publisher standard errors retained; no confidence level or interval inferred. Aggregate reporting scope is recorded in the current source-specific publication review.

Standalone text benchmark; no new combined index. Source identity/effort/protocol qualifications remain in Data and CSV.

All published reasoning settings, including Claude Max, are included by default. Display labels use Low and xHigh; source labels remain in the retained records.

Official source · Publication terms / evidence

Publisher terms. Scores and resource figures are attributed to the original publisher.