LuminaBench
Healthcare benchmark / Vals AI

MedScribe

Lumina VerifiedLumina checked the published sources, versions, model labels, score extraction and conversion. External evaluations were run by their publishers; Lumina has not independently rerun or reproduced them.

Accuracy

Version 1-updated-2026-10-29Verified 6 November 2026109 published resultsOfficial source

MedScribe

LuminaBench
Show
20 of 104 models · best variant per model
03006009001,2001,086Claude Opus 5.5Max1,085Claude Fable 5.1Max1,084Claude Sonnet 5.5Max1,083Claude Opus 5Max1,077Muse Spark 1.2xHigh1,073Claude Haiku 5.5Max1,072Grok 4.7xHigh1,072Wonder FullMax1,069GLM 5.3 FlashMax1,069Muse Spark 1.1xHigh1,068GLM 5.3Max1,066Claude Fable 5Max1,065MiMo V2.6 Pro1,063GPT-5.1High1,063Kimi K3Max1,062GPT-6 AstraMax1,059Gemini 4 ArgonHigh1,058MiniMax-M31,055Grok 4.5High1,055GPT-5.5xHigh

Lumina Score vs Cost per Task

Published per-test USD and Duration/Test retain their native definitions. Tokens use published averages or original aggregate counts divided by token_tasks_measured; total = input + output, with cache and reasoning subsets retained separately rather than counted twice. No task values are inferred from token prices or compute budgets.

LuminaBench
15 of 104 families
Lower resource use and higher score (green); higher resource use and lower score (red). Guides split at the visible selection’s medians.$0.003$0.01$0.03$0.1$0.3$14006008001,000Cost per task · USD (log scale)Lumina ScoreClaude Opus 5.5Claude Fable 5.1Claude Sonnet 5.5Claude Opus 5Muse Spark 1.2GLM 5.3 Flash

Lumina Score vs Tokens

Published per-test USD and Duration/Test retain their native definitions. Tokens use published averages or original aggregate counts divided by token_tasks_measured; total = input + output, with cache and reasoning subsets retained separately rather than counted twice. No task values are inferred from token prices or compute budgets.

LuminaBench
15 of 102 families
20K40K60K4006008001,000Total tokens per taskLumina ScoreClaude Opus 5.5Claude Fable 5.1Claude Sonnet 5.5Claude Opus 5Muse Spark 1.2Grok 4.7

Lumina Score vs Time per Task

Published per-test USD and Duration/Test retain their native definitions. Tokens use published averages or original aggregate counts divided by token_tasks_measured; total = input + output, with cache and reasoning subsets retained separately rather than counted twice. No task values are inferred from token prices or compute budgets.

LuminaBench
15 of 104 families
Lower resource use and higher score (green); higher resource use and lower score (red). Guides split at the visible selection’s medians.134006008001,000Time per task · min (log scale)Lumina ScoreClaude Opus 5.5Claude Fable 5.1Claude Sonnet 5.5Claude Opus 5Muse Spark 1.2Kimi K3

Published per-test USD and Duration/Test retain their native definitions. Tokens use published averages or original aggregate counts divided by token_tasks_measured; total = input + output, with cache and reasoning subsets retained separately rather than counted twice. No task values are inferred from token prices or compute budgets. Missing metrics are omitted from their graph; quality scores remain available.

Results table

Method & coverage

Synthetic doctor-patient text transcripts to SOAP notes, temperature 1, maximum 30k output tokens; no audio transcription input.

Published per-test USD and Duration/Test retain their native definitions. Tokens use published averages or original aggregate counts divided by token_tasks_measured; total = input + output, with cache and reasoning subsets retained separately rather than counted twice. No task values are inferred from token prices or compute budgets.

How the Lumina conversion works

1,000 + 75 × ((original score − 78.72087155963301) / 11.097770099266052). The result is rounded once. Scores may tie.

Frozen initial observed text-only cohort; one mean per exact publisher release/API, balancing repeated settings/routes within that release. Original score and protocol remain separate. No inferred variants or future refitting.

Calibration
vals-medscribe-z75-v1 · experimental
Reference mean
78.72087155963301
Population SD
11.097770099266052
Coverage
Standalone benchmark.
Identity, exclusions & attribution

Publisher standard errors retained; no confidence level or interval inferred. Aggregate reporting scope is recorded in the current source-specific publication review.

Standalone text benchmark; no new combined index. Source identity/effort/protocol qualifications remain in Data and CSV.

All published reasoning settings, including Claude Max, are included by default. Display labels use Low and xHigh; source labels remain in the retained records.

Official source · Publication terms / evidence

Publisher terms. Scores and resource figures are attributed to the original publisher.