LuminaBench
Social Mobility benchmark / Vals AI

Public Benefits Bench v1.1

Lumina VerifiedLumina checked the published sources, versions, model labels, score extraction and conversion. External evaluations were run by their publishers; Lumina has not independently rerun or reproduced them.

Accuracy

Version 1.1-updated-2026-10-12Verified 6 November 202650 published resultsOfficial source

Public Benefits Bench v1.1

LuminaBench
Show
20 of 50 models · best variant per model
03006009001,2001,140Claude Opus 5Max1,121Claude Fable 5.1Max1,110Wonder FullMax1,081Claude Opus 5.5Max1,079Claude Fable 5Max1,077WonderMax1,073Gemini 4 ArgonHigh1,065MiMo V2.6 Pro1,062Hy4 Preview1,061GLM 5.3Max1,061Muse Spark 1.2xHigh1,058Kimi K3Max1,057Claude Opus 4.8Max1,052MiMo V2.6 Flash1,049Claude Sonnet 5.5Max1,048Qwen 3.8 Max1,045Grok 4.6High1,042GPT-5.6 SolMax1,039Ember-11,038Claude Sonnet 5Max

Lumina Score vs Cost per Task

Published per-test USD and Duration/Test retain their native definitions. Tokens use published averages or original aggregate counts divided by token_tasks_measured; total = input + output, with cache and reasoning subsets retained separately rather than counted twice. No task values are inferred from token prices or compute budgets.

LuminaBench
15 of 50 families
Lower resource use and higher score (green); higher resource use and lower score (red). Guides split at the visible selection’s medians.$0.03$0.1$0.3$1$3$108009001,0001,1001,200Cost per task · USD (log scale)Lumina ScoreMiMo V2.6 FlashClaude Opus 5Claude Fable 5.1Wonder FullWonderMiMo V2.6 Pro

Lumina Score vs Tokens

Published per-test USD and Duration/Test retain their native definitions. Tokens use published averages or original aggregate counts divided by token_tasks_measured; total = input + output, with cache and reasoning subsets retained separately rather than counted twice. No task values are inferred from token prices or compute budgets.

LuminaBench
15 of 50 families
1M3M8009001,0001,1001,200Total tokens per task (log scale)Lumina ScoreClaude Opus 5Claude Fable 5.1Wonder FullClaude Opus 5.5Claude Fable 5Wonder

Lumina Score vs Time per Task

Published per-test USD and Duration/Test retain their native definitions. Tokens use published averages or original aggregate counts divided by token_tasks_measured; total = input + output, with cache and reasoning subsets retained separately rather than counted twice. No task values are inferred from token prices or compute budgets.

LuminaBench
15 of 50 families
Lower resource use and higher score (green); higher resource use and lower score (red). Guides split at the visible selection’s medians.10308009001,0001,1001,200Time per task · min (log scale)Lumina ScoreKimi K3Claude Opus 5Claude Fable 5.1Claude Fable 5WonderMuse Spark 1.2

Published per-test USD and Duration/Test retain their native definitions. Tokens use published averages or original aggregate counts divided by token_tasks_measured; total = input + output, with cache and reasoning subsets retained separately rather than counted twice. No task values are inferred from token prices or compute budgets. Missing metrics are omitted from their graph; quality scores remain available.

Results table

Method & coverage

Public Benefits Bench SNAP scenario conversations, expert rubrics and optional web search; primary published overall kept with row-specific task/condition provenance. Do not mix auxiliary condition comparisons as extra models.

Published per-test USD and Duration/Test retain their native definitions. Tokens use published averages or original aggregate counts divided by token_tasks_measured; total = input + output, with cache and reasoning subsets retained separately rather than counted twice. No task values are inferred from token prices or compute budgets.

How the Lumina conversion works

1,000 + 75 × ((original score − 62.006780000000006) / 8.002297118427933). The result is rounded once. Scores may tie.

Frozen initial observed text-only cohort; one mean per exact publisher release/API, balancing repeated settings/routes within that release. Original score and protocol remain separate. No inferred variants or future refitting.

Calibration
vals-public-benefits-z75-v1 · experimental
Reference mean
62.006780000000006
Population SD
8.002297118427933
Coverage
Standalone benchmark.
Identity, exclusions & attribution

Public Benefits Bench SNAP scenario conversations, expert rubrics and optional web search; primary published overall kept with row-specific task/condition provenance. Do not mix auxiliary condition comparisons as extra models.

Publisher standard errors retained; no confidence level or interval inferred. Aggregate reporting scope is recorded in the current source-specific publication review.

Standalone text benchmark; no new combined index. Source identity/effort/protocol qualifications remain in Data and CSV.

All published reasoning settings, including Claude Max, are included by default. Display labels use Low and xHigh; source labels remain in the retained records.

Official source · Publication terms / evidence

Publisher terms. Scores and resource figures are attributed to the original publisher.