LuminaBench
Cyber benchmark / Vals AI

SRE Bench

Lumina VerifiedLumina checked the published sources, versions, model labels, score extraction and conversion. External evaluations were run by their publishers; Lumina has not independently rerun or reproduced them.

Accuracy

Version 1-updated-2026-11-05Verified 6 November 202637 published resultsOfficial source

SRE Bench

LuminaBench
Show
20 of 37 models · best variant per model
03507001,0501,4001,211GPT-6 AstraMax1,182GPT-6.1 SolMax1,151Gemini 4 ArgonHigh1,100Claude Opus 5.5Max1,090Daybreak BlueMax1,085GPT-5.6 SolMax1,085GPT-6 SolMax1,083Claude Sonnet 5.5Max1,068Kimi K3.1 ProMax1,048Claude Fable 5.1Max1,043Claude Opus 5.5 (CVP)Max997Claude Opus 5Max995Wonder FullMax991Gemini 3.8 FlashHigh984GPT-5.6 TerraMax982GLM 5.3Max966Claude Haiku 5.5Max960Gemini 3.7 FlashHigh958MiMo V2.6 Flash956Grok 4.7xHigh

Lumina Score vs Cost per Task

Published per-test USD and Duration/Test retain their native definitions. Tokens use published averages or original aggregate counts divided by token_tasks_measured; total = input + output, with cache and reasoning subsets retained separately rather than counted twice. No task values are inferred from token prices or compute budgets.

LuminaBench
15 of 37 families
Lower resource use and higher score (green); higher resource use and lower score (red). Guides split at the visible selection’s medians.$3$10$309001,0001,1001,200Cost per task · USD (log scale)Lumina ScoreGPT-6 AstraGPT-6.1 SolDaybreak BlueGemini 4 ArgonGPT-5.6 SolClaude Opus 5.5

Lumina Score vs Tokens

Published per-test USD and Duration/Test retain their native definitions. Tokens use published averages or original aggregate counts divided by token_tasks_measured; total = input + output, with cache and reasoning subsets retained separately rather than counted twice. No task values are inferred from token prices or compute budgets.

LuminaBench
15 of 36 families
10M30M100M9001,0001,1001,200Total tokens per task (log scale)Lumina ScoreGPT-6 AstraGemini 4 ArgonClaude Opus 5.5Daybreak Blue

Lumina Score vs Time per Task

Published per-test USD and Duration/Test retain their native definitions. Tokens use published averages or original aggregate counts divided by token_tasks_measured; total = input + output, with cache and reasoning subsets retained separately rather than counted twice. No task values are inferred from token prices or compute budgets.

LuminaBench
15 of 37 families
Lower resource use and higher score (green); higher resource use and lower score (red). Guides split at the visible selection’s medians.01002003009001,0001,1001,200Time per task · minLumina ScoreGPT-6 AstraGPT-6.1 SolGemini 4 ArgonClaude Opus 5.5Daybreak BlueGPT-5.6 Sol

Published per-test USD and Duration/Test retain their native definitions. Tokens use published averages or original aggregate counts divided by token_tasks_measured; total = input + output, with cache and reasoning subsets retained separately rather than counted twice. No task values are inferred from token prices or compute budgets. Missing metrics are omitted from their graph; quality scores remain available.

Results table

Method & coverage

SRE Bench software reverse engineering: protected programs, behavioral analysis and text/code tools; not a site-reliability question benchmark.

Published per-test USD and Duration/Test retain their native definitions. Tokens use published averages or original aggregate counts divided by token_tasks_measured; total = input + output, with cache and reasoning subsets retained separately rather than counted twice. No task values are inferred from token prices or compute budgets.

How the Lumina conversion works

1,000 + 75 × ((original score − 12.87389189189189) / 15.60654684485793). The result is rounded once. Scores may tie.

Frozen initial observed text-only cohort; one mean per exact publisher release/API, balancing repeated settings/routes within that release. Original score and protocol remain separate. No inferred variants or future refitting.

Calibration
vals-srebench-z75-v1 · experimental
Reference mean
12.87389189189189
Population SD
15.60654684485793
Coverage
Standalone benchmark.
Identity, exclusions & attribution

SRE Bench software reverse engineering: protected programs, behavioral analysis and text/code tools; not a site-reliability question benchmark.

Publisher standard errors retained; no confidence level or interval inferred. Aggregate reporting scope is recorded in the current source-specific publication review.

Standalone text benchmark; no new combined index. Source identity/effort/protocol qualifications remain in Data and CSV.

All published reasoning settings, including Claude Max, are included by default. Display labels use Low and xHigh; source labels remain in the retained records.

Official source · Publication terms / evidence

Publisher terms. Scores and resource figures are attributed to the original publisher.